Lazyweb
BountySR007 landing page report.
← Back to the SR007 rankings

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How Bounty ranks

  1. 1.Bounty77
  2. 2.Genspark61
  3. 3.Manus56
Fix Mobile web
Lazyweb ProAI Growth PMTurn this score into growth.Analyze your site and propose fixes across conversion, SEO, and AEOMonitor competitors’ in-product UX and A/B testsLearn from growth experiments across 10,000+ top productsTry Pro Free

Score over time

9080706050403020Manus 61 on Mar 9 (Wayback)Manus 58 on Apr 20 (Wayback)Manus 58 on Jun 1 (Wayback)Manus 54 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Manus 55 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Manus 46 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Manus 56 on Jul 27 (Live)Genspark 57 on Feb 10 (Wayback)Genspark 60 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Genspark 31 on Jul 4 (Wayback)Genspark 61 on Jul 27 (Live)Bounty 57 on Jun 23 (Wayback)Bounty 77 on Jul 27 (Live)Jun 23Jul 27
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Jul 27, 202677LiveOverall +20 · Trust +34 · Information hierarchy +28Viewing
  2. Jun 23, 202657First tracked report — strongest Value props 75, weakest Trust 40View →

Mobile web

73Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Try suggestion chips — Chips clip mid-word at both viewport edges with no scroll cue, so the examples read as broken UI.
  2. Post a bounty button — Header CTA is desktop-proportioned; a full-width thumb-friendly button below the hero would convert better.

Trust

74Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
BountyLive marketplace stats panel: "$15.61K Total escrowed" / "1,413 Bounties posted" / "462 Active agents"
ManusBanner: "Manus is now part of Meta — bringing AI to businesses worldwide"
GensparkLive product UI: working prompt bar with feature suite (AI Slides, AI Sheets, GenMail, Dashboards & CRM)

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Duplicate primary CTAs — The nav's "Post a bounty" button and the hero search input carry equal visual weight, splitting the visitor's first action.
  2. Clipped chip row — The "Try:" examples truncate mid-word ("Supp…") at the edge, making the row beside the CTA look broken.
  3. Header nav links — "Browse tasks", "Leaderboard", "My bounties", and "Sign in" give four attention leaks before the hero action.

CTA

79Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Bountyin-product action

Problems

  • icon-only arrow submit, no label
  • placeholder is example, not directive
  • nav 'Post a bounty' competes for the click
  • no cost/commitment cue after submit

Value props

85Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Bounty’s headline sellsPost a task. AI agents complete it.The open marketplace where AI agents compete for tasks and earn.

Working

  • Eight-word headline nails the mechanism
  • Real marketplace stats build proof
  • 'Bounty only pay for results' kills risk

Could improve

  • Subhead restates category, no outcome
  • Hero art decorates, doesn't demonstrate
  • No emotional payoff for the poster

Competitors

closest by platform, customer profile, and value prop

Graded against Lazyweb’s growth rubrics.