Lazyweb
BlueprintSR007 landing page report.
← Back to the SR007 rankings

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Blueprint ranks

  1. 1.Flux80
  2. 2.Blueprint73
  3. 3.Leo AI71
  4. 4.Adam67
  5. 5.Zoo (Text-to-CAD)54
Fix Trust
Lazyweb ProAI Growth PMTurn this score into growth.Analyze your site and propose fixes across conversion, SEO, and AEOMonitor competitors’ in-product UX and A/B testsLearn from growth experiments across 10,000+ top productsTry Pro Free

Score over time

9080706050Flux 80 on Jul 27 (Live)Adam 64 on May 1 (Wayback)Adam 66 on May 21 (Wayback)Adam 64 on Jun 5 (Wayback)Adam 66 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Adam 67 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Adam 67 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Adam 67 on Jul 27 (Live)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 56 on Feb 25 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 58 on Mar 8 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 56 on Mar 17 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 56 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 54 on May 18 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 54 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Zoo (Text-to-CAD) 54 on Jul 27 (Live)Leo AI 66 on Jan 29 (Wayback)Leo AI 71 on Apr 8 (Wayback)Leo AI 71 on Jul 27 (Live)Blueprint 70 on Feb 11 (Wayback)Blueprint 68 on Mar 13 (Wayback)Blueprint 67 on May 10 (Wayback)Blueprint 66 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Blueprint 66 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Blueprint 72 on Jul 19 (Wayback)Blueprint 73 on Jul 27 (Live)Feb 11Mar 13May 10Jun 2Jun 9Jul 19Jul 27
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Jul 27, 202673LiveOverall +1 · Trust +7 · Information hierarchy +4Viewing
  2. Jul 19, 202672Overall +6 · Mobile web +10 · CTA +9View →
  3. Jun 9, 202666Value props −4 · Information hierarchy −2View →
  4. Jun 2, 202666Overall −1 · Information hierarchy −2 · CTA −2View →
  5. May 10, 202667Overall −1 · Mobile web −6 · Trust −4View →
  6. Mar 13, 202668Overall −2 · Information hierarchy −4 · Value props −4View →
  7. Feb 11, 202670First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 80, weakest Trust 42View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Blueprint
Leo AI
Flux
Trust read
Blueprint"COMMUNITY PROJECTS" gallery showing rendered hardware prototypes (labeled smart glasses, robot, handheld radio)
FluxUsage counters: "1,099,361 Builders", "6,425,482 Projects", "821,334 Components"
Adam"Backed by Y Combinator" badge
Zoo (Text-to-CAD)"API Makeathon submissions are LIVE" banner with dates "JULY 22 - AUGUST 5, 2026"
Leo AI"Trusted by Industry Leaders" logo wall with Bosch, Scania, HP, MIT, Philips, Toyota, and Mobileye

Value props

74Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Blueprint’s headline sellsBLUEPRINT SOMETHING REALCreate hardware prototype designs by chatting with AI

Working

  • Subhead names mechanism and output plainly
  • Prompt box demonstrates the product live
  • Community photos prove real hardware output

Could improve

  • Headline is a pun, not a value claim
  • Zero numbers or proof stats on the fold
  • Unclear what a 'design' deliverable includes

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Summer Build Contest pill — Highest-contrast button on the page sits below the prompt box and outranks the actual conversion action.
  2. Gray send button — The primary submit icon is washed-out gray and reads as disabled, hiding the one action the fold wants.
  3. MORE link — A styled exit button in the fold pulls attention to browsing projects before a prompt is ever submitted.

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Blueprintin-product action
Flux

Problems

  • icon-only submit, no label
  • submit styled gray, looks disabled
  • no 'free' signal near input
  • placeholder truncates mid-word

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Send icon button — Low-contrast gray icon reads as disabled and is a small tap target for the page's primary action.
  2. Sign-in icon button — Unlabeled black icon tile — mobile users can't tell it means sign in.
  3. LITE model selector — Cryptic label with no context adds decision friction inside the prompt box.

Competitors

closest by platform, customer profile, and value prop

Graded against Lazyweb’s growth rubrics.