Lazyweb
San Francisco DataSR007 landing page report.
← Back to the SR007 rankings
San Francisco Datahttps://www.sfdata.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How San Francisco Data ranks

  1. 1.TollBit72
  2. 2.San Francisco Data68
  3. 3.Datarade68
  4. 4.Protege62
  5. 5.Narrative56
Fix Trust
68Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust34CTA64Value props72Information hierarchy84Mobile web84
category scoresShowHide
Trust34CTA64Value props72Information hierarchy84Mobile web84
Lazyweb ProAI Growth PMTurn this score into growth.Analyze your site and propose fixes across conversion, SEO, and AEOMonitor competitors’ in-product UX and A/B testsLearn from growth experiments across 10,000+ top productsTry Pro Free

Score over time

8070605040Protege 62 on Jan 31 (Wayback)Protege 63 on Mar 12 (Wayback)Protege 62 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Protege 63 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Protege 62 on May 4 (Wayback)Protege 63 on Jul 4 (Wayback)Protege 62 on Jul 28 (Live)TollBit 71 on Feb 19 (Wayback)TollBit 72 on Mar 27 (Wayback)TollBit 72 on Apr 14 (Wayback)TollBit 72 on Apr 21 (Wayback)TollBit 71 on May 19 (Wayback)TollBit 70 on Jun 18 (Wayback)TollBit 72 on Jul 28 (Live)Datarade 64 on Feb 3 (Wayback)Datarade 65 on Feb 21 (Wayback)Datarade 64 on Mar 4 (Wayback)Datarade 65 on May 15 (Wayback)Datarade 65 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Datarade 68 on Jul 22 (Wayback)Narrative 54 on Feb 16 (Wayback)Narrative 54 on Feb 25 (Wayback)Narrative 52 on Mar 9 (Wayback)Narrative 54 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Narrative 56 on May 11 (Wayback)Narrative 53 on May 26 (Wayback)Narrative 56 on Jul 28 (Live)San Francisco Data 68 on Jul 28 (Live)Jul 28

Trust

34Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Datarade
TollBit
Trust read
San Francisco DataNo visible trust signal identified.
ProtegeNo visible trust signal identified.
TollBitFour-column capability grid naming concrete products: "Agent Site", "Portfolio analytics", "Licensed RAG access", "NLWeb
Datarade"2600+ trusted data providers worldwide" in the hero subhead
NarrativeNo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

San Francisco Data
TollBit
Dataradein-product action

Problems

  • vague contact ask, no value payoff
  • conflicts with nav 'Contact' label
  • sales-call cost feel

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

San Francisco Data’s headline sellsTurn your data into a revenue stream.We appraise, structure, and license your data to qualified AI buyers, with security and rights management built in.

Working

  • Outcome-led headline: revenue from data
  • Subhead names mechanism: appraise, license
  • Addresses security and rights fears

Could improve

  • No numbers, deals, or buyer proof
  • Fog-bridge hero shows nothing of product
  • Who it's for (data owners) stays implicit

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Contact nav button — Boxed styling duplicates the primary CTA and pulls first-glance attention to the top-right corner.
  2. About Us button — Same footprint as "Get in touch", splitting the action row into two equal-weight choices.
  3. Caption arrow button — An interactive arrow beside the bridge caption invites a click that leads nowhere near the conversion.

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Get in touch button — Shares its row with "About Us" at half-width — the primary CTA should be full-bleed and thumb-sized on mobile.
  2. Eyebrow tagline — Wide letter-spaced caps run edge-to-edge with no side padding, making the line feel cramped against the viewport.

Competitors

closest by platform, customer profile, and value prop
#1TollBittollbit.com72
#2San Francisco Data68
#3Dataradedatarade.ai68 #4Protegewithprotege.ai62 #5Narrativenarrative.io56

Graded against Lazyweb’s growth rubrics.